RE: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group Hums

Martin

Exactly what products support HELD right now?

If you want location verification and location signing - are these 
deployed today?

Doesn't all these mean something has to be changed or upgraded?

Broadband providers in the US have given away FREE home routers to 
enable a service as recently as a year ago.  So, taking the stance 
that this won't happen is looking facts to the contrary in the eye 
and saying "that didn't happen" *or* "that's not going to happen"....

At 04:34 PM 4/19/2007, Dawson, Martin wrote:
>Does DHCP require a change to the residential CPE James? How long is it
>going to take to change every residential router in the world? Do you
>think it is an unreasonable requirement to not have to do this?
>
>You can't just object to HELD on the basis that you think it's been
>misrepresented. I don't accept that it has - but in any case, it's not a
>technical rationale.
>
>Cheers,
>Martin
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: James M. Polk [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Friday, 20 April 2007 7:31 AM
>To: Dawson, Martin; John Schnizlein; Andrew Newton
>Cc: GEOPRIV WG; Allison Mankin; [email protected]
>Subject: RE: [Geopriv] Confirmation of GEOPRIV IETF 68 Working Group
>Hums
>
>At 04:20 PM 4/19/2007, Dawson, Martin wrote:
> >"DHCP is not adequate because it doesn't meet multiple sets of
> >requirements as documented multiple times ..."
>
>bologna
>
>"documented multiple times" means in individual submissions
>
>of which, zero facts were presented to substantiate
>
>If DHCP were so inadequate, why is the DSL forum now going to specify
>it? Why does PacketCable define it?  These were fairly recent moves...
>
>And, how many times has HELD been presented as if it were a product
>of an IETF WG?
>
>James
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>This message is for the designated recipient only and may
>contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
>If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
>immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of
>this email is prohibited.
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>[mf2]

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf