Re: More in result field obsoleted

avri wrote:
> for backward compatibility I propose just indicating that it obsolete. 
> I.e. indicate in the write up that it SHOULD NOT be used.  That of
> course leaves open of the issue of what happens if someone does set the
> more flag.  The 'liberal in what is accepted' would indicate that it
> should be accepted.

I agree that it should be documented as obsolete.
It's good practice to allow the flag for a while after it's been
obsoleted but I don't think we can require it to be implemented.
It's up to the implementation...

/Georg
-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Georg Kullgren            Nortel Networks AB    [email protected]
Systems Architect         S:t Eriksgatan 115 A  Tel:   +46-8-50 88 36 18
Routing Architecture Lab  SE-113 85 Stockholm   Mobile: +46-703-14 36 18
ATI Strategic Protocols   Sweden                Fax:   +46-8-50 88 35 01