Re: progress on recovery support

On onsdag, sep 17, 2003, at 10:44 Asia/Seoul, passjay wrote:

> Hi,
>
>  
>
> I would like to know the progress on recovery support in GSMPv3.

I have not made any yet beyond the support for 1+1 in the -02 version 
of the base spec.  We still need a reasonable solution for other 
protection methods.

>
> According to the last meeting and mailing list, only protection 
> support in GSMPv3 was consented.

We were supposed to continue the conversation on the list and arrive at 
a consensus decision on what should be done.  There has not been any 
discussion.

The only decision so far has been for support protection with 
restoration being defined as a controller only activity.  though even 
this decision has not been discussed on the list  yet

>
> In order to support the function, we need to modify connection 
> management, port configuration message, event message, failure 
> response message, and so on.

Yes, indeed, we need some change, but we as a group have not arrived at 
an agreement of what level of support we need.

>
> Does anybody or design team have some ideas and progress on them?

I would like to see the various thoughts and suggestions people have 
had in private brought to the list for discussions.

>
> Actually, in the document GSMPv3 for optical support describes above 
> mentioned functions but needs to be modified.

Perhaps you can float some ideas and suggestions on the list.  i think 
that would help us a lot in making progress.

Thanks for the email.

a.