Re: proposed solution for recovery

On torsdag, sep 18, 2003, at 13:48 Asia/Seoul, Avri Doria wrote:

>
> On torsdag, sep 18, 2003, at 13:13 Asia/Seoul, passjay wrote:
>
>> We have already proposed one of recovery support solutions in optical 
>> spec.
>>
>> Would you like to examine section 4.1, 5.1 9.1, and 9.2 in optical 
>> spec.
>
>
>

I have a general question, not only for you as for the group.  One of 
the implication of your proposed changes to the reservation messages 
where you associate multiple (port,label) pairs with a connection 
reservation is that all recovery links will have the same (i assume) 
service attributes and traffic parameters.  one of the things that 
concerned me was the generality of the solution.  Is it the case that 
all recovery links for any technology would have the same service and 
traffic attributes.   While i have been  assuming they would have the 
same adaptations, i have been assuming that they would not necessarily 
have the same attributes in all cases.  This is one reason i have taken 
a different approach, i.e for greater flexibility.

Another question I have, and this applies to the proposal in the 
optical support draft as well as the one that will show up soon in the 
base draft.

Can one connection have connections (a,b,c) in its recovery set  while 
another has connections (b,c,d)?

a.