Re: update of base draft

Hi,

thanks for your comments.

On torsdag, okt 2, 2003, at 15:56 Asia/Seoul, passjay wrote:

> There are some typing errors in base draft(03).
>
> - page 23, line 1; 0x1 --> 0x2
> - page 83, line 24; &amp&amp --> &&

thanks

>
> AND more,
> In "draft-ietf-gsmp-reqs-06.txt" referred switch configuration in
> section 2.3. for layer switching identification. But the base spec(03)
> does not specify this function. In optical spec section 8.1 we proposed
> one way of identification of optical switch spec block. However, this
> block should be carefully taken into consideration in base spec to
> support general form of switch configuration. According to the
> requirements, base spec should provide a guideline to extend and modify
> switch configuration for general purpose.

Yes, I missed that.  I will look into adding either the technology 
specific block or a specific, but general purpose, layering field/block 
to the configuration message.  This will show up in the next draft 
though i will send the list a proposal next week.

Which reminds me that I am still waiting for a contribution (perhaps 
part of the TDM spec) that discusses layering in detail and proposes 
methods for handling it beyond this configuration message.

a.