Re: Fw: more changes to the base draft
Avri Doria <[email protected]> Wed, 26 Nov 2003 20:54:54 +0900
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.gsmp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Weiming, comments inline. On onsdag, nov 26, 2003, at 17:52 Asia/Seoul, Wang,Weiming wrote: > > Hi Avri, > > I'm writing to seek the possiblity in GSMP base header to add > following items: > > 1. A proirity flag to indicate the processing priority for the > message. Can you explain how you would think this should be used? > 2. An optional checksum part in GSMP for error control. Again, can you explain how you would want to see this used? > > If possible, I also ask to leave some space in the Version field for > possible including of other > possible protocols like GRMP > (http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wang-forces-grmp-01.txt). If the two protocols were to be merged it would seem to make the most sense to me for there to be one base protocol which supported the MPLS and GMPLS mode as well as the router mode. I would personally be uncomfortable with one version of the protocol for switches and one for routers. In many respects I think that the support one would need for adding messages for router support already exists. If this merge is something that is of interest to the Wg and something we can get IESG support for (i think it would require a charter amendment) then I think we could certainly work out the details here on the list. I do think your first 2 requests can be discussed within the current work without any charter problems. For the other, I would like to hear from other list members on whether it is something that the WG should pursue. a.