RE: Fw: more changes to the base draft
"Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <[email protected]> Fri, 5 Dec 2003 17:03:06 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.gsmp |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Avri I had one question on this.. Technically speaking GRMP seems quite different from GSMP v3 to me. How could you possibly merge these protocols ? I must be missing something here. Thanks Hormuzd -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Avri Doria Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 3:55 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Fw: [GSMP] more changes to the base draft Hi Weiming, comments inline. On onsdag, nov 26, 2003, at 17:52 Asia/Seoul, Wang,Weiming wrote: > > Hi Avri, > > I'm writing to seek the possiblity in GSMP base header to add=20 > following items: > > 1. A proirity flag to indicate the processing priority for the=20 > message. Can you explain how you would think this should be used? > 2. An optional checksum part in GSMP for error control. Again, can you explain how you would want to see this used? > > If possible, I also ask to leave some space in the Version field for=20 > possible including of other > possible protocols like GRMP=20 > (http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wang-forces-grmp-01.txt). If the two protocols were to be merged it would seem to make the most=20 sense to me for there to be one base protocol which supported the MPLS=20 and GMPLS mode as well as the router mode. I would personally be=20 uncomfortable with one version of the protocol for switches and one for=20 routers. In many respects I think that the support one would need for=20 adding messages for router support already exists. If this merge is something that is of interest to the Wg and something=20 we can get IESG support for (i think it would require a charter=20 amendment) then I think we could certainly work out the details here on=20 the list. I do think your first 2 requests can be discussed within the current =20 work without any charter problems. For the other, I would like to=20 hear from other list members on whether it is something that the WG=20 should pursue. a. _______________________________________________ GSMP mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gsmp