Re: RFC 3292 vs standard

Sanjeev,
the differences between the last draft (-11) and rfc3292 are editorial, 
i.e. they don't change the protocol. The draft-ietf-gsmp-11.txt version 
was approved by the wg and the iesg and the rfc3292 is just the result 
from the rfc editor process.

regards,
ken 

[email protected] wrote:

>
>hi !!
>
> I have a very samll query but i need to know urgently.
> I have been exploring the evolution of the gsmp standard.
>
>I have been comparing that draft-ietf-gsmp-11.txt is almost similar with all the
>headings
>and sub-headings. The standard documnet RFC 3292 also seems to be similar.
>
>Can somebody suggest me where can i find the information about the differences
>between them. I need them urgently.
>
>thanks and warm regards
>Sanjeev
>
>DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Hughes Software Systems
>Limited (HSS) and is intended solely for the use of the individual
>to whom it is addressed. It may contain  privileged or confidential
>information  and should not be circulated or used for any purpose other
>than for what it is intended. If you have received this message in error,
>please notify the originator immediately. If you are not the intended
>recipient, you are notified that you are strictly prohibited from using,
>copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message. HSS accepts
>no responsibility for loss or damage arising from the use of the information
>transmitted by this email including damage from virus.
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>GSMP mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gsmp
>

-- 

Kenneth Sundell
Sr. Protocols Architect
CTO/ATI Strategic Protocols
Nortel Networks (Sweden)
ESN 521-3538, Ext IAC+46 8 5088-3538