Re: Comments on RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis

Hi all,

yes, we will update the document as soon as possible.

BR,
Samu Varjonen

On 19/06/15 10:06, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
> Authors of RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis,
>
> the RFC5203bis document has a Normative reference to RFC6263bis:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-08#section-3.3
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-01
>
> RFC 6253bis is an expired document. First we need to revise it so that
> it re-appears in the IETF archives. Additionally, since it is a
> normative dependency of RFC5203bis, we should include it in the
> publication batch we are currently working on (RFC5203bis, RFC5204bis,
> and RFC5205bis).
>
> Authors of RFC6253, could you please provide the WG with am update on
> your plans to revise this document?
>
> Authors of RFC5203bis, could you please update the following outdated
> reference?
>
>    draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis -> RFC 7401
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gonzalo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Hipsec mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec