Re: Comments on RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis

Samu Varjonen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.hipsec,gmane.ietf.hip
Message-ID <[email protected]>
  Hi Gonzalo,

In my opinion yes

BR,
Samu

Lainaus Gonzalo Camarillo <[email protected]>:

> Hi Samu,
>
> to be clear, you are saying that the draft is ready for Working Group
> Last Call, is that right?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gonzalo
>
> On 01/07/2015 9:14 AM, Samu Varjonen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> to my knowledge rfc6253-bis does not need changes to work with rfc7401.
>> Review and comments would still be welcome.
>>
>> -Samu
>>
>> On 30/06/15 10:10, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
>>> Hi Samu,
>>>
>>> thanks for having revised RFC6253bis:
>>>
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis/
>>>
>>> Could you please let us know the current status of the draft now that
it
>>> has been revised? That is, what needs to happen next and what is needed
>>> overall before the draft is ready for WGLC.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Gonzalo
>>>
>>> On 23/06/2015 11:15 AM, Samu Varjonen wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> yes, we will update the document as soon as possible.
>>>>
>>>> BR,
>>>> Samu Varjonen
>>>>
>>>> On 19/06/15 10:06, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
>>>>> Authors of RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis,
>>>>>
>>>>> the RFC5203bis document has a Normative reference to RFC6263bis:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-08#section-3.3
>>>>>
>>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-01
>>>>>
>>>>> RFC 6253bis is an expired document. First we need to revise it so
that
>>>>> it re-appears in the IETF archives. Additionally, since it is a
>>>>> normative dependency of RFC5203bis, we should include it in the
>>>>> publication batch we are currently working on (RFC5203bis,
RFC5204bis,
>>>>> and RFC5205bis).
>>>>>
>>>>> Authors of RFC6253, could you please provide the WG with am update on
>>>>> your plans to revise this document?
>>>>>
>>>>> Authors of RFC5203bis, could you please update the following outdated
>>>>> reference?
>>>>>
>>>>>     draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis -> RFC 7401
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Gonzalo
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Hipsec mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Hipsec mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>>>>  
>
>  

_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.