Re: Comments on RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis
Samu Varjonen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.hipsec,gmane.ietf.hip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Gonzalo, In my opinion yes BR, Samu Lainaus Gonzalo Camarillo <[email protected]>: > Hi Samu, > > to be clear, you are saying that the draft is ready for Working Group > Last Call, is that right? > > Thanks, > > Gonzalo > > On 01/07/2015 9:14 AM, Samu Varjonen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> to my knowledge rfc6253-bis does not need changes to work with rfc7401. >> Review and comments would still be welcome. >> >> -Samu >> >> On 30/06/15 10:10, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: >>> Hi Samu, >>> >>> thanks for having revised RFC6253bis: >>> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis/ >>> >>> Could you please let us know the current status of the draft now that it >>> has been revised? That is, what needs to happen next and what is needed >>> overall before the draft is ready for WGLC. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Gonzalo >>> >>> On 23/06/2015 11:15 AM, Samu Varjonen wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> yes, we will update the document as soon as possible. >>>> >>>> BR, >>>> Samu Varjonen >>>> >>>> On 19/06/15 10:06, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: >>>>> Authors of RFC5203bis and RFC6253bis, >>>>> >>>>> the RFC5203bis document has a Normative reference to RFC6263bis: >>>>> >>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-08#section-3.3 >>>>> >>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-01 >>>>> >>>>> RFC 6253bis is an expired document. First we need to revise it so that >>>>> it re-appears in the IETF archives. Additionally, since it is a >>>>> normative dependency of RFC5203bis, we should include it in the >>>>> publication batch we are currently working on (RFC5203bis, RFC5204bis, >>>>> and RFC5205bis). >>>>> >>>>> Authors of RFC6253, could you please provide the WG with am update on >>>>> your plans to revise this document? >>>>> >>>>> Authors of RFC5203bis, could you please update the following outdated >>>>> reference? >>>>> >>>>> draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis -> RFC 7401 >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Gonzalo >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Hipsec mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Hipsec mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec >>>> > > _______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec