Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis

Gonzalo Camarillo <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.hipsec,gmane.ietf.hip
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Authors,

could you please address Tom's comments below and revise the draft
accordingly?

Thanks,

Gonzalo

On 23/07/2015 1:19 AM, Tom Henderson wrote:
> 
> 
> On 07/03/2015 01:08 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:> Folks,
>>
>> I would like to start a WGLC on the following draft. This WGLC will end
>> on July 26th (i.e., right after the IETF meeting):
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis/
>>
>> Please, send your comments to this list.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Gonzalo
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hipsec mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>>
> 
> Below are my (minor) comments on this draft.  It is mostly unchanged from RFC6253, and I am fine with proceeding once the nits are fixed.
> 
> - references to RFC4843 should be replaced by references to RFC7343
> 
> - IANA considerations section should be redone; since you are not introducing any new parameters, you should just ask IANA to replace references to RFC6253 (for the CERT parameter, Certificate Types, and Notify Message Types) with references to this specification.
> 
> - in Section 3, replace 
>   IP Address:2001:2C:5a14:26de:a07c:385b:de35:60e3
>   with
>   IP Address:2001:2c:5a14:26de:a07c:385b:de35:60e3
> 
> 
> Tom
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Hipsec mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.