Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis
Samu Varjonen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.hipsec,gmane.ietf.hip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, Addressed the comments from T. Henderson in the version 03. BR, Samu Varjonen On 27/07/15 10:40, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: > Authors, > > could you please address Tom's comments below and revise the draft > accordingly? > > Thanks, > > Gonzalo > > On 23/07/2015 1:19 AM, Tom Henderson wrote: >> >> On 07/03/2015 01:08 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:> Folks, >>> I would like to start a WGLC on the following draft. This WGLC will end >>> on July 26th (i.e., right after the IETF meeting): >>> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis/ >>> >>> Please, send your comments to this list. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Gonzalo >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Hipsec mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec >>> >> Below are my (minor) comments on this draft. It is mostly unchanged from RFC6253, and I am fine with proceeding once the nits are fixed. >> >> - references to RFC4843 should be replaced by references to RFC7343 >> >> - IANA considerations section should be redone; since you are not introducing any new parameters, you should just ask IANA to replace references to RFC6253 (for the CERT parameter, Certificate Types, and Notify Message Types) with references to this specification. >> >> - in Section 3, replace >> IP Address:2001:2C:5a14:26de:a07c:385b:de35:60e3 >> with >> IP Address:2001:2c:5a14:26de:a07c:385b:de35:60e3 >> >> >> Tom >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Hipsec mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec >> > _______________________________________________ > Hipsec mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec