Re: Status of our next batch
Ari Keränen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.hipsec,gmane.ietf.hip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, We were thinking of adding a bit more details on the relaying part of the native NAT traversal draft, but after giving it bit more though, probably that is not necessary. We will do final review for the draft to make sure it is aligned with the rest of the documents, but after that, we should be good to go forward with the WGLC. Cheers, Ari > On 18 Nov 2015, at 08:52, Gonzalo Camarillo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Authors of the following drafts, > > could you please let the WG know their status and what needs to happen > next for each of them in order to be able to WGLC them at some point in > the future? > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-multihoming/ > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal/ > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis/ > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis/ > > Thanks, > > Gonzalo > > _______________________________________________ > Hipsec mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec