Re: IPCOMP support in HIP

Miika Komu <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.hipsec,gmane.ietf.hip
Organization Ericsson AB
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi,

I guess it could be a new "IPCOMP" transform similar to the ESP transform:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7402#section-5.1.2

I think R1-I2 would be enough, no need to confirm it in R2, similarly as 
with ESP transform:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7402#section-5.2.1

On 03/10/2016 03:29 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> I have found comp in TLS, RFC 3749, so HIP's ESP is the only one missing
> compression.  How did I miss that?  It should have been included in 7402
> as an option within ESP.
>
> I will figure out a way to get it into some RFC, but perhaps a little
> hashing out how it would work is called for first:
>
> IPCOMP parameter is a list.  The parameter number is higher than ESP;
> something like 4111.
>
> RFC 3173 defines the Compression Parameter Index as 2 bytes, so that
> would be the size of the values in the list.
>
> R1 would have a list of supported IPCOMP algorithms.
> I2 would have the selected algorithm, or a value of ZERO if none.
> R2 would have the confirmed value.
>
> NOTIFY could be used to set up IPCOMP (or change it) at a later time.
>
> Comments?
>
>
> On 03/09/2016 10:20 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> Why did we not create a parameter to negotiate IPCOMP (currently RFC
>> 3173)?
>>
>> In IKEv2 it is negotiated in NOTIFY messages, not the basic exchange
>> and becomes part of the daughter SA(s).
>>
>> On contrained networks, IPCOMP could well be of value.  Also if HIP is
>> used to establish the SAs for SSE (draft-moskowitz-sse-02.txt) and the
>> SSE payload is XML, then IPCOMP (or some variant tbd) may be a good
>> thing.
>>
>> So....
>>
>> Again, why no IPCOMP parameter?
>>
>> IPCOMP parameter handled like ESP parameter or like in IKEv2?
>>
>> How to add an IPCOMP parameter?  If I write a draft for a Generic
>> Protocol Compression, I can include a section that defines an
>> IPCOMP/GPCOMP parameter.  Or I can add it to DEX (don' want to add
>> that at this point, EC25519 fits, IPCOMP is expanding the protocol).
>>
>> Comments?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hipsec mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Hipsec mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec

_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
smime.p7s (application/pkcs7-signature, 4 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.