Re: Status of our next batch
Gonzalo Camarillo <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.hipsec,gmane.ietf.hip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Tom, what is the status of the multihoming draft? When do you think you will get around to submitting a version that is ready for WGLC? Thanks, Gonzalo On 04/02/2016 5:06 PM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: > Hi Tom, > > thanks for the update. We will wait until you get around to revising the > multihoming draft as well and then we will WGLC them together. > > Cheers, > > Gonzalo > > On 01/02/2016 7:59 AM, Tom Henderson wrote: >> >> >> On 11/17/2015 11:52 PM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: >>> Authors of the following drafts, >>> >>> could you please let the WG know their status and what needs to happen >>> next for each of them in order to be able to WGLC them at some point in >>> the future? >>> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-multihoming/ >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal/ >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis/ >>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis/ >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Gonzalo >> >> Gonzalo and all, >> >> Here is a brief update on the mobility and multihoming drafts. I posted a revision 10 of RFC5206-bis last week: >> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-10.txt >> >> I believe that we could close all the remaining open issues as either resolved or wontfix (editorial); the changes that appear in draft-10 are as follows: >> - issue 21: clarified that HI MAY be included in UPDATE >> for benefit of middleboxes >> - changed one informative reference from RFC 4423-bis to RFC 7401 >> - removed discussion about possible multiple LOCATOR_SET >> and ESP_INFO parameters in an UPDATE (per previous >> mailing list discussion) >> - removed discussion about handling LOCATOR_SET parameters in packets >> other than UPDATE (per previous mailing list discussion) >> >> I had hoped to post a revision of the multihoming draft with all of the open issues resolved by now, but there is still some work for me to do, so I just refreshed the previous version for the time being: >> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-hip-multihoming-07.txt >> >> I will work on publishing -08 shortly and then I think we could consider a WGLC on the pair of drafts. >> >> - Tom >> > > _______________________________________________ > Hipsec mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec >