Re: A review of draft-ietf-hip-dex-02.txt
René Hummen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.hipsec,gmane.ietf.hip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANS20HM1dgdNcJFfYDMk1ZgFM2e9ZFabTQ32VR64h9VnGisUBg@mail.gmail.com> |
Hi Miika, 2016-05-20 11:48 GMT+02:00 Miika Komu <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > On 05/16/2016 06:50 PM, René Hummen wrote: > >> Hi Miika, all, >> >> thanks for reviewing the draft! >> > > my pleasure. I am ok with your changes, just a small note below. > > > 2.1. Requirements Terminology >> >> In section 6.3, you are introduce also -> notation, which was >> not explained. >> >> >> I didn't think an explanation of this formal notation was necessary as >> it is also not further described, e.g., in RFC5869. What would you like >> me to write here? >> > > I should probably read RFC5869 before I can understand how to implement > the key derivation for DEX. It was a bit difficult to follow what is the > input and especially what is the resulting output. > > The reference for RFC5869 is missing? > I added the reference during my revision. BR René _______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec