Re: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-08: (with COMMENT)

HI,

bis-09 has a new IANA considerations section that is based on the old one and 
clearly marks the changes to be made to the registry.

-Samu

On 06/07/16 04:13, Ben Campbell wrote:
> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-08: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I agree with Alexey's discuss comment that the IANA considerations from
> the obsoleted RFC need to be pulled forward to this one. In my opinion,
> if the RFC is obsoleted, one should no longer need to read it.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Hipsec mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec