Re: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-09: (with COMMENT)

Hi Ben,

The IANA Considerations used to be a copy of RFC 5205 but someone
asked that it be cleaned up. I will copy it back in the next revision.

Thanks.

--julien

On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Ben Campbell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-09: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Please replicate the appropriate info from the RFC 5205 IANA
> considerations. The similar section in this draft does not seem to stand
> alone. Readers should not need to refer back to the obsoleted RFC to
> understand this version.
>
>