Re: Alexey Melnikov's Discuss on draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Julien Laganier <[email protected]> Thu, 4 Aug 2016 17:46:55 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.hipsec,gmane.ietf.hip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAE_dhjvbcm-2VCR0NiKpyhEgofvRsWUHwAJ3w3=+EtM5uyCEHA@mail.gmail.com> |
FYI I've addresses your concern with the IANA considerations as discussed in the last draft revision. Best, --julien On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Julien Laganier <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Alexey, > > The IANA Considerations used to be a copy of RFC 5204 but someone > asked that it be cleaned up. I will copy it back in the next revision. > > Thanks. > > --julien > > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]> wrote: >> Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis-07: Discuss >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >> introductory paragraph, however.) >> >> >> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> DISCUSS: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> The IANA considerations section does not seem to stand alone without >> reading RFC 5204. As you are obsoleting RFC 5204, readers shouldn't be >> expected to read it in order to discover original IANA instructions. >> I think you should copy information from RFC 5204. >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> In Section 6: >> >> This section is to be interpreted according to the Guidelines for >> Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs [RFC5226]. >> >> This sentence is not needed, because RFC 5204 didn't define any >> registries, so none of the text from RFC 5226 applies. I suggest you >> delete this sentence. >> >>