Re: Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-hip-multihoming-11: (with COMMENT)

Jari Arkko <[email protected]> Wed, 14 Sep 2016 15:16:08 +0300

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.hipsec,gmane.ietf.hip
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Thanks for your review, Stephen.

> - I think section 6 ought note the privacy issue that
> was relatively recently with WebRTC and ICE where a
> client might not want all of it's IP addresses
> exposed, as doing so could expose the fact that the
> client e.g. is using Tor or another VPN service. The
> issue being that in some locations, that information
> may be quite sensitive.  4.2 notes this but in a quite
> opaque way, ("may be held back") but it'd be better to
> say some more.

Seems very reasonable.

> 5.1 is also relevant maybe in that it
> says one "SHOULD avoid" sending info about virtual
> interfaces. Anyway, I think it'd be good to add some
> recognition of this privacy issue to section 6. I am
> not arguing that this draft ought specify the one true
> way to avoid this problem, but only that it be
> recognised.

Yes

Jari

_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 842 B)