updates to HIP mobility and multihoming drafts
Tom Henderson <[email protected]> Mon, 10 Oct 2016 17:22:43 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.hipsec,gmane.ietf.hip |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The new versions of the HIP mobility and multihoming drafts address various review comments received during IESG reviews. Besides editorial changes, the following changes were made to RFC 5206-bis version 14: * Replace references to 'middleboxes' with more specific |'NATs and firewalls' and make reference to RFC 5207 * Describe a simple heuristic for setting the credit value for Credit-Based Authorization based on sending rate and RTT. * Add subsection about privacy concerns of locator exposure to the Security Considerations section. * Clarify that a host must be able to receive and avoid reprocessing redundant LOCATOR_SET parameters that may have been sent in parallel to multiple addresses of the host. * Clarify that multicast or broadcast addresses must not be announced in a LOCATOR_SET. and the following to the multihoming draft version 12: * Added section about locator privacy concerns ! to the Security Considerations section. * Added section about relationship to split tunnel issues to the Security Considerations section. I believe that all outstanding comments and issues have been addressed. - Tom _______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec