Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-15

>> I might suggest to recommend NOTIFY (and define the keepalive) and state
>> that other messages including ICMPv6 or UPDATE may be substituted.  If
>> there is a need for bi-directional connectivity checking, recommend to use
>> UPDATE;  if there are specific known scenarios where an ICMPv6 is
>> recommended instead, state those scenarios.
>    
> Tom, this sounds fine to me. Normal UPDATEs over UDP should be fine, but I
> think we shouldn't device a new UPDATE mechanism tied to controlled role
> (sorry for thinking aloud :)
>    
> Jeff, is this ok for you?

Yes, this sounds good.

thanks,
-Jeff