RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-hubmib-mau-mib-v3-03.txt

On Tue, 20 May 2003, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:

> I am OK with this document. So it seems ready for IETF Last Call.
> 
> I think the comments below can be don during rfc-editor auth48 call.
> 
> I would add that I prefer to not have citations in MIB clauses.
> They get lost when a MIB module is extracted. For example
>           DESCRIPTION "Compliance for MAUs attached to repeater
>                        ports.
> 
>                        Note that compliance with this compliance
>                        statement requires compliance with the
>                        snmpRptrModCompl MODULE-COMPLIANCE statement of
>                        the SNMP-REPEATER-MIB [RFC2108]."
> 
> reads equally well if you replace [RFC2108] with RFC 2108.
> 
> There are more of these.
> 
> There were a few in the etherlike-mib too by the way.

Just to be perfectly clear, may I suggest

 s/[RFC2108]/(RFC 2108)/

as the global change (and similarly for the other cases).  That way
the text will read "... of the SNMP-REPEATER-MIB ((RFC 2108)."

Thanks,

Mike