RE: MIB doctor comments on draft-ietf-hubmib-power-ethernet-mib-05.txt

On Fri, 23 May 2003, McTague, Charles wrote:
> In the pethPsePortEntry I noticed that entries 6, 9, 10, and 12
> are not used.  The same sparseness occurs in pethMainPseEntry
> with entries 5 and 6.
> 
> Is this sparse OID allocation a result of multiple changes over
> the 5 drafts and could therefore be compressed, or is there
> another reason behind it?  I realize this is perfectly legal
> from the syntax side of things, but I thought I would ask.

Thanks for pointing this out;  I missed it completely, and
recommend that the OID assignments be made contiguous.

Mike