RE: hubmib minutes

"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.hubmib
Message-ID <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F038A9C67@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com>
Please see in-line.

Regards,

Dan



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edward Beili [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 04 March, 2004 8:56 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Hubmib] hubmib minutes
> 
> 
> Dan,
> 
> > Since next versions of the drafts will be the last call ...
> 
> Could you please explain the procedure and the time line for 
> the drafts
> approval.
> 

The Working Group Last Call is a formal step in the process of pushing a work on the IETF standards track. When the WG Chair considers the work stable enough he/she calls for a Last Call period (at least two weeks) in which the WG members can send their comments to the list. If there are no comments, consensus is declared and the Internet-Drafts will be submitted to the IESG for consideration as IETF standards. If there are problems, the document is re-edited, new version is published, and the process is repeated until consensus this is appropriate quality is reached.

Note that this is only the beginning of the story. The IESG has its own process, composed of an Area Director quality review, IETF Last Call, and IESG members review. Then there is a clerical step by the RFC Editor. At the end of the process, you have some more gray hair, but you may be the author of a standards track RFC. 

The WG charter schedules calls for us to reach WG Last Call after the IETF meeting this week. My expectation is that we can solve all the pending problems and issue I-Ds good enough for Last Call in the weeks following the IEEE meeting.


> 
> I assume all the editors and the chair are going to be 
> present at the EFM
> meeting in Kissimmee in a week. I propose we meet to sync. How about
> Tuesday, March 23 at 18:00?

This cannot be a formal interim meeting, because we do not have the 30 days required by the IETF rules to call for such a meeting. Informal meetings are OK, but I suggest that all discussions and proposals will be made on the WG e-mail list, so that all WG members can express particpate in the discussions.
 
> 
> Regards,
> -Edward
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 04:12 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]; Shailaja Yadawad
> Subject: [Hubmib] hubmib minutes
> 
> 
> Please find attached the minutes of the Ethernet Interfaces 
> and Hub MIB WG
> meeting hold at the 59th IETF. Thanks to Shailaja Yadawad for 
> volunteering
> to be the minutes taker during the meeting.
> Regards,
> Dan
> <<minutes_hubmib_ietf59.txt>> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.