FW: MAU MIB revision
"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.hubmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F056B3444@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com> |
Bert's response. Regards, Dan -----Original Message----- From: Wijnen, Bert (Bert) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 01 September, 2004 5:46 PM To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: MAU MIB revision > > Bert, > @ San Diego a proposal was made in the hubmib meeting to > revise the MAU MIB so that it refers a IANA maintained TC for > MAU types. This would allow adding in the future new MAU > types as the Ethernet evolution requires without re-opening > the MAU MIB RFC each time. Some discussions followed and the > proposal seems to have received a consensus, both in the room > as on the list. We have a volunteer (Ed Beili) to edit the > new version of the document and a MIB doctor (Mike Heard) who > seems to be interested to support and review this work. I saw all of that. > I would like to formally ask your AD approval to do this work. > If we need a formal recharter for this, the text item, and > the schedules would look like this: > Revise the MAU MIB so that it refers a IANA maintained TC for > MAU types. This would allow adding in the future new MAU > types as the Ethernet evolution requires without re-opening > the MAU MIB RFC each time. > > Initial Draft - October 2004 > WG Last Call - December 2004 > Submit to the IESG for consideration as a Proposed Draft > standard, replacing RFC 3636 - January 2005 > We also need to update the current schedules as follows: > second WG Last Call - October 2004 > Submit to the IESG for consideration as proposed standards - > November 2004. I think I can support that. Why don't you go ahead with the initial work while I bring this up in IESG. I suspect I cannot do so till Sept 16th. But that should not stop people from doing good work. Bert > Thanks and Regards, > Dan >