RE: RE: EFM OAM MIB and the DateAndTime TC

Grant Schnebly <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.hubmib
Message-ID <30C8EC18FA0B92458918317E864AABCE01CE204B@mailsrv.chats.int.mrv.com>
Matt,
 
Your "third approach" is best - it's not much work for a Manager to crudely
match the Agent's sysUpTime with its own clock, and so derive a reasonable
approximation of the Agent's DateAndTime.
 
If the Agent does know the DateAndTime, it should use that whenever it
internally logs events in persistent memory.  Otherwise, between reboots the
Agent loses track of the time of old events.
 
 > [sysUpTime] would create extra work on those systems that do have
date/time
 
If there is any extra work, it's negligible, and limited to the Manager
side.
 
-Grant
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Squire [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 10:06 AM
To: Chris Leak
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: [Hubmib] RE: EFM OAM MIB and the DateAndTime TC


 
Hi Chris - 
 
Your question on what to do with timestamps for systems that don't have
date/time hasn't been discussed in context of this MIB draft, so I'd like to
see what others think.  It doesn't appear to be covered by the textual
conventions doc, so I'm guessing that means its open to interpretation.  
 
You point out that there is some precedent for returning zeros, or returning
a date/time approximation based on sysUpTime.  It seems that from a utility
point of view the latter approach is better as relative times are preserved,
but the first approach is certainly simpler and easier to document.  A third
approach would be to change from DateAndTime to use sysUpTime instead for
the timestamps.  Although this would solve the "what to do if you don't know
the date/time" problem, it would create extra work on those systems that do
have date/time (assuming most people want timestamps in the date/time
format).  
 
Maybe some others can shed some light/opinions on the subject of how to
handle date/time when it is not available on the system. 
 
- Matt
 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Leak [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 5:56 PM
To: Matt Squire
Cc: Don Kate; Manu Kaycee
Subject: EFM OAM MIB and the DateAndTime TC



Matt,

 

Has there been any discussion regarding the implementation of the
dot3OamEventLogTimestamp object on systems where the date and time are not
available? I've seen examples of some MIBs on the standards track where the
value '0000000000000000'H is recommended in this case and one example where
sysUpTime was converted into a date and time. So far, this seems to be an
issue that's being addressed on a case by case basis. Any suggestions?

 

Thanks,

 

Chris Leak

Senior Software Engineer

Metrobility Optical Systems

[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 

(603) 589-0681

_______________________________________________
Hubmib mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hubmib
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.