RE: FW: EPON MIB comments

"Glen Kramer" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.hubmib
Organization Teknovus
Message-ID <[email protected]>
[GK] Objects eponDeviceStatTxFramesQueue[0-7],
eponDeviceStatRxFramesQueue[0-7], and
eponDeviceStatDroppedFramesQueue[0-7]
are not specific to EPON. These objects exist for other devices, such as
bridge ports. There is no need to duplicate these objects here. Besides,
neither 802.3ah nor 802.1D standards require exactly 8 queues to be
implemented. I recommend removing these objects.

[LK] The report message in the MPCP refers to such entities. Please see
section 64.3.6.2 for report message format. These counters refer to that.

[GK] The REPORT message does not refer directly of indirectly to any such
entities. I attached the clause 64.3.6.2. Would appreciate if you could
point where and how this clause refers to count of transmitted, received,
and dropped frames. 
I agree that these are useful parameters. But my point is that they are
already defined and are not EPON-specific. There is no need to duplicate
them in this MIB.
 
Regards,
Glen

_______________________________________________
Hubmib mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hubmib
Clause64.3.6.2.pdf (application/pdf, 18.7 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.