RE: FW: EPON MIB comments
"Glen Kramer" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.hubmib |
|---|---|
| Organization | Teknovus |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[GK] Objects eponDeviceStatTxFramesQueue[0-7], eponDeviceStatRxFramesQueue[0-7], and eponDeviceStatDroppedFramesQueue[0-7] are not specific to EPON. These objects exist for other devices, such as bridge ports. There is no need to duplicate these objects here. Besides, neither 802.3ah nor 802.1D standards require exactly 8 queues to be implemented. I recommend removing these objects. [LK] The report message in the MPCP refers to such entities. Please see section 64.3.6.2 for report message format. These counters refer to that. [GK] The REPORT message does not refer directly of indirectly to any such entities. I attached the clause 64.3.6.2. Would appreciate if you could point where and how this clause refers to count of transmitted, received, and dropped frames. I agree that these are useful parameters. But my point is that they are already defined and are not EPON-specific. There is no need to duplicate them in this MIB. Regards, Glen _______________________________________________ Hubmib mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hubmib
Clause64.3.6.2.pdf
(application/pdf, 18.7 KB) - not displayed