RE: Comments on draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-mib-02.txt
"Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.hubmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F07FA6BCB@IS0004AVEXU1.global.avaya.com> |
Hmmm... I believe that the two Unsigned32 is kind of tolerated by the latest guidelines, so this case is not well defined. I would provide you a waiver to using the UNITS clause, and rather mention in the DESCRIPTION clauses that the combination of the two objects should be displayed as 'packets' for example. I am copying our friend Mike Heard - he may have a different opinion on this. Regards, Dan E11. I would strongly recommend to add UNITS clauses for all objects where these apply, especially for counters I added units for all of the normal things (bytes, frames, etc.). How do I handle when a 64-bit quantity is split between two Unsigned32s? Are both Unsigned32s the same unit thats being counted by the 64-bit quantity, or am i supposed to refer to the Hi/Lo 32-bits as different UNITs? _______________________________________________ Hubmib mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hubmib