Re: Working Group Last Call
"C. M. Heard" <[email protected]> Sun, 30 Oct 2005 17:11:16 -0800 (PST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.hubmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 30 Oct 2005, I wrote, regarding Edward Beili's proposal to add a TC for auto-negotiation capabilities to the IANA-MAU-MIB and use it in the definitions of ifMauAutoNegCapabilityBits, ifMauAutoNegCapAdvertisedBits and ifMauAutoNegCapReceivedBits: > If there is a realistic possibility that future MAU types will > support auto-negotiation, then it is probably advantageous to > put the capability list under IANA maintenance so that it (like > the MAU types) can be expanded quickly upon approval of a new > 802.3 standard. The main counter-argument would be that doing > this would lengthen an already protracted process. In making a > decision it might be useful to solicit input from the 802.3 WG > regarding the likelihood of the introduction of new > auto-negotiation capabilities. I just went poking around on the 802.3 web site and found the following document that was presented at the Oct. 17 - 18, 2005 interim meeting of the P802.3an (10GBASE-T) Task Force: http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/802/3/an/public/oct05/vandoorn_1_1005.pdf It discusses auto-negotiation registers for 10GBASE-T. I think that is pretty strong evidence that there is indeed a realistic possibility that future MAU types will support auto-negotiation. Regards, Mike Heard