RE: FW: Reviewed 802.3af MIBs

Thanks to Dave Perkins for the detailed review that he performed. 

I would like to request that the authors of the two documents address
the issues raised by Dave and provide a proposal for their resolution on
the list. 

Thanks and Regards,

Dan


 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 2:47 PM
> To: Hub MIB
> Subject: [Hubmib] FW: Reviewed 802.3af MIBs
> 
>  
> 
> 
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David T. Perkins [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 8:18 AM
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> Cc: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Subject: Reviewed 802.3af MIBs
> 
> HI,
> 
> Attached are the reviews for the MIB module documents.
> 
> In general, I don't believe that the modules were ready for review.
> Also, the IEEE 802.3af has resulted in 3 documents (and maybe 
> 4, if you count the mau MIB 3636bis I-D). However, these 
> documents do not seem coordinated with each other or 
> coordinated with other interface types that have come from 
> the 802.3 document family.
> 
> I'm sorry I took so long. The job was difficult, and I'm sure 
> that I spent over 40 hours on this job and several hours on 
> the phone to Loir in Israel. There were many times that I was 
> confused and came to incorrect conclusions, and had to 
> restart. Note that taking the IEEE CMIP GDMO and converting 
> to IETF MIB modules is never easy due to the differences 
> between SNMP and CMIP modeling and due to the complex IETF 
> interface modeling (which has been somewhat of a moving target).
> 
> If I wasn't clear in any of my comments, please send questions.
> 
> Regards,
> /david t. perkins
> 
>