RE: Response to comments on OAM doc

(speaking as a contributor) 

Grrrrr ... I did not want to enter into a naming discussion at this
stage, but it looks like we got into one anyway. 

There is no overall convention for names of hubmib MIB modules to be
prefixed by DOT3. If there is a consistency to be reached, I would
rather aim all EFM MIB module names to be prefixed by EFM. 

Thus, the module names I would recommend to be used in the four
documents are:

EFM-OAM-MIB 
EFM-CU-MIB
EFM-EPON-MIB
EFM-EPON-DEVICE-MIB

The descriptors associated with the module identity and the other
descriptors of MIB objects within the MIB modules should be a lower case
version of the module name prefix without hyphenation of course, as
recommended in Annex C of RFC 4181.

Regards,

Dan


 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David T. Perkins [mailto:[email protected]] 
> 
> 6.   MIB Definition
> 
>   EFM-COMMON-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN 
> 
> ]] This module name doesn't follow the naming conventions
> ]] in the [MIBguidelines] document. However, I can't determine
> ]] if it should be DOT3-OAM-MIB, or "EFM-OAM-MIB".
> 
> MBS: It should be DOT3-OAM-MIB to me, so that's what I'll 
> change it to.
> 
>   <<text deleted>>
> 
>      efmOamMIB MODULE-IDENTITY 
> 
> ]] Not sure if should be efmOamMIB or dot3OamMIB
> 
> MBS: Changed to dot3OamMIB
> 
>