RE: IEEE 802.3ah - EOAM - clause 57 - need clarification on the statements in section 57.2.11.4 & 57.2.11.6

"Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <[email protected]> Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:42:46 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.hubmib
Message-ID <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F0A0D0478@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com>
Geetha,
 
draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-mib-03.txt is not expired. As it is under review
by the IESG its validity is extended automatically. A MIB Doctor review
was performed by Dave Perkins, and the recommendations were made
available on the list - please see the archives. The editor is preparing
a new version to answer the comments in the MIB Doctor review. 
 
Regards,
 
Dan
 
 
 
 


  _____  

	From: Geetha K [mailto:[email protected]] 
	Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 10:38 AM
	To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); [email protected]
	Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]
	Subject: RE: [Hubmib] IEEE 802.3ah - EOAM - clause 57 - need
clarification on the statements in section 57.2.11.4 & 57.2.11.6
	
	
	Hello Dan,
	 
	Thank you very much for response. I will forward my questions to
IEEE 802.3 WG.
	 
	I have come across the draft mib
"draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-mib-03.txt" for 
	Ethernet OAM that expired on September, 2005. 
	 
	Is that MIB standardised (or) Are there any other new draft
versions coming in?
	 
	Thank you in advance.
	 
	Best Regards,
	Geetha.

		-----Original Message-----
		From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:[email protected]]
		Sent: Friday, 17 February 2006 12:55 PM
		To: [email protected]; [email protected]
		Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]
		Subject: RE: [Hubmib] IEEE 802.3ah - EOAM - clause 57 -
need clarification on the statements in section 57.2.11.4 & 57.2.11.6
		
		
		Geetha,
		 
		I believe that you are asking questions that are related
to the IEEE 802.3 standards, and not to the Ethernet MIB work that is
being done in the IETF. I suggest that you address your clarification
questions to the IEEE 802.3 Working Group. 
		 
		Best Regards,
		 
		Dan Romascanu
		hubmib WG Chair
		 
		 
		 
		 
		 


  _____  

			From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Geetha K
			Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 4:35 PM
			To: [email protected]
			Cc: [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]
			Subject: [Hubmib] IEEE 802.3ah - EOAM - clause
57 - need clarification on the statements in section 57.2.11.4 &
57.2.11.6
			
			
			 
			Section 57.2.11.6:
			=============
			To ensure correct operation, the OAM client
needs to, within one second of 
			receiving a Loopback Control OAMPDU with the
Enable OAM Remote Loopback 
			command:
			a) Set its local_par_action parameter to LB and
the local_mux_action to DISCARD 
			    via OAM_CTL.request service primitive.
			b) Send an Information OAMPDU.  
			 
			 
			
			Section 57.2.11.4:
			=============
			Since Information OAMPDUs are continually sent
to keep the OAM Discovery process
			from re-starting, the occasional loss of an
Information OAMPDU should not adversely 
			impact the operation of OAM remote loopback
mode. 
			 
			 
			The above 2 statements are conflicting: 
			- first statement insists on sending OAMPDU
within one second to ensure correct operation 
			- second statement says that loss os Information
OAMPDU should not adversely impact 
			   the operation of OAM ermote loopback mode.
			 
			 
			In Remote loopback mode, what will happen if the
remote peer is not responding with 
			an information OAMPDU within a second after
sending a remote loopback command? 
			This is critical as the Multiplexer at the local
DTE will be put in Discard state until an 
			information OAMPDU is received and all the
frames from higher layers will be dropped.
			 
			Clarification on this will be highly
appreciated.
			 
			 
			Thank you.
			 
			Regards,
			Geetha.
			 
			
			
	
************************************************************************
***
			This message is proprietary to Future Software
Limited (FSL)
			and is intended solely for the use of the
individual to whom it
			is addressed. It may contain privileged or
confidential information
			and should not be circulated or used for any
purpose other than for
			what it is intended.

	
************************************************************************
***
	This message is proprietary to Future Software Limited (FSL)
	and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it
	is addressed. It may contain privileged or confidential
information
	and should not be circulated or used for any purpose other than
for
	what it is intended.
	If you have received this message in error, please notify the
	originator immediately. If you are not the intended recipient,
	you are notified that you are strictly prohibited from using,
	copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message.
	FSL accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from
	the use of the information transmitted by this email including
	damage from virus.
	
************************************************************************
***

_______________________________________________
Hubmib mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hubmib