RE: IEEE 802.3ah - EOAM - clause 57 - need clarification on the statements in section 57.2.11.4 & 57.2.11.6
"Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <[email protected]> Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:42:46 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.hubmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F0A0D0478@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com> |
Geetha, draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-mib-03.txt is not expired. As it is under review by the IESG its validity is extended automatically. A MIB Doctor review was performed by Dave Perkins, and the recommendations were made available on the list - please see the archives. The editor is preparing a new version to answer the comments in the MIB Doctor review. Regards, Dan _____ From: Geetha K [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 10:38 AM To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: RE: [Hubmib] IEEE 802.3ah - EOAM - clause 57 - need clarification on the statements in section 57.2.11.4 & 57.2.11.6 Hello Dan, Thank you very much for response. I will forward my questions to IEEE 802.3 WG. I have come across the draft mib "draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-mib-03.txt" for Ethernet OAM that expired on September, 2005. Is that MIB standardised (or) Are there any other new draft versions coming in? Thank you in advance. Best Regards, Geetha. -----Original Message----- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, 17 February 2006 12:55 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: RE: [Hubmib] IEEE 802.3ah - EOAM - clause 57 - need clarification on the statements in section 57.2.11.4 & 57.2.11.6 Geetha, I believe that you are asking questions that are related to the IEEE 802.3 standards, and not to the Ethernet MIB work that is being done in the IETF. I suggest that you address your clarification questions to the IEEE 802.3 Working Group. Best Regards, Dan Romascanu hubmib WG Chair _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Geetha K Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 4:35 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [Hubmib] IEEE 802.3ah - EOAM - clause 57 - need clarification on the statements in section 57.2.11.4 & 57.2.11.6 Section 57.2.11.6: ============= To ensure correct operation, the OAM client needs to, within one second of receiving a Loopback Control OAMPDU with the Enable OAM Remote Loopback command: a) Set its local_par_action parameter to LB and the local_mux_action to DISCARD via OAM_CTL.request service primitive. b) Send an Information OAMPDU. Section 57.2.11.4: ============= Since Information OAMPDUs are continually sent to keep the OAM Discovery process from re-starting, the occasional loss of an Information OAMPDU should not adversely impact the operation of OAM remote loopback mode. The above 2 statements are conflicting: - first statement insists on sending OAMPDU within one second to ensure correct operation - second statement says that loss os Information OAMPDU should not adversely impact the operation of OAM ermote loopback mode. In Remote loopback mode, what will happen if the remote peer is not responding with an information OAMPDU within a second after sending a remote loopback command? This is critical as the Multiplexer at the local DTE will be put in Discard state until an information OAMPDU is received and all the frames from higher layers will be dropped. Clarification on this will be highly appreciated. Thank you. Regards, Geetha. ************************************************************************ *** This message is proprietary to Future Software Limited (FSL) and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or confidential information and should not be circulated or used for any purpose other than for what it is intended. ************************************************************************ *** This message is proprietary to Future Software Limited (FSL) and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or confidential information and should not be circulated or used for any purpose other than for what it is intended. If you have received this message in error, please notify the originator immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message. FSL accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from the use of the information transmitted by this email including damage from virus. ************************************************************************ *** _______________________________________________ Hubmib mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hubmib