RE: IF types durring review of EPON-04
"Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <[email protected]> Sat, 13 May 2006 17:32:37 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.hubmib |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <AAB4B3D3CF0F454F98272CBE187FDE2F0A7B745C@is0004avexu1.global.avaya.com> |
(also copying the hubmib list) Thanks to DaveT for stepping up with this. Unless there is another volunteer who shows up during the coming week, 5/19 is a good date to start a second review. Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dave Thaler > Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 8:49 PM > To: David T. Perkins; [email protected] > Subject: RE: IF types durring review of EPON-04 > > I've been doing the reviews of relationships to the > Interfaces MIB, so I can do this, but I'm swamped right now. > I could probably get to this by end of next week (5/19) if > someone else doesn't get to it before then. > > -Dave > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David T. Perkins > Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 10:25 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: IF types durring review of EPON-04 > > HI, > > I'm doing a second review of EPON-04 I-D, which is > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-epon > -mib-04.tx > t > > It is very complex and the previous review raised many questions. > The good news is that it is MUCH better, and it is finally to > the level that someone can make sense of it. However, given > that it is an interface MIB module, there are many additional > considerations that must be followed. I don't remember all of > them, and would need to refresh myself with these > considerations to do a complete job. Is there anyone that can > do a scan after I finish the first pass? > > One question that I have so far is what interface type to use > for the virtual links. The document uses the same value as > the physical (which is gigabitEthernet(117)), but it seems to > me that the propVirtual(53) is more appropriate. > > In trying to determine the value for ifType, I looked at > http://www.iana.org/assignments/ianaiftype-mib > In it I see that there are 234 types defined. > This seems like an extremely large number. Also, there is not > a reference for each assigned value. > Thus, I could not figure out from looking at these values > what values the should be used in the EPON MIB module. This > seems like a generic problem that anyone implementing object > ifType would encounter. And a delemma for anyone creating a > new interface MIB module. > > Are there any suggestions that would help me now with the > EPON MIB module, and for making it easier for future > interface MIB module developers? > > Regards, > /david t. perkins > > > > > >