RE: RE: xDSL Bonding - Reuse of the hubmib-efm-cu-mib work

 
So this will be a distinct MIB module. 
 
I am copying the hubmib WG list, because I am not convinced that such a
change can be treated as editorial and that we can or should avoid
another WGLC for draft-hubmib-efm-cu-mib. 
 
Dan
 
 
 
 


  _____  

	From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] 
	Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 4:28 PM
	To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
	Cc: [email protected]; David Kessens (E-mail);
[email protected]; [email protected]
	Subject: Re: [Adslmib] RE: xDSL Bonding - Reuse of the
hubmib-efm-cu-mib work
	
	

	Hello Dan, 
	
	        What you suggest is fine, but I would rather that the
table be placed under the ifMIB - ifMIBObjects branch together with 
	the ifStack Table or perhaps directly under MIB-2 as the
ifInvertedStack MIB is situated. Being placed inside the efmCuMIB branch

	seems to suggest  that it is  for the sole use of the efmCuMIB
and this is no longer the case if the xDSL MIB modules import it. 
	        
	
	Best Regards, 
	Menachem Dodge
	
	
	
	
"Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)" <[email protected]> 

27/08/2006 12:47 

To
<[email protected]>, <[email protected]> 
cc
[email protected], "David Kessens \(E-mail\)" <[email protected]>,
[email protected] 
Subject
[Adslmib] RE: xDSL Bonding - Reuse of the hubmib-efm-cu-mib work

	




	Menachem, 
	  
	I am adding David Kessens who is the shepherding AD for hubmib
(I, being the chair, cannot play both roles). 
	  
	Why should ifAvailableStack be defined in a separate MIB module,
rather than changing the text in DESCRIPTION clauses and having it
imported by ADSL MIB modules from EFM-CU-MIB? 
	  
	Speaking as WG chair, I feel that in case a major change is
introduced in the document the WGLC needs to be redone. At this moment
we agreed for a technical iteration to fix some smilint problems without
redoing the LC. 
	  
	Dan 
	  
	  
	  
	
	
  _____  

	From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] 
	Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 8:08 PM
	To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); [email protected]
	Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
	Subject: xDSL Bonding - Reuse of the hubmib-efm-cu-mib work
	
	
	Hello Dan, 
	
	
	       Recently the issue of xDSL bonding has been raised on the
ADSL MIB WG mailing list. 
	
	       I have spoken briefly with Edward and we think that it
should be possible for us to re-use the ifAvailableStack table defined
in 
	draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-cu-mib-05. 
	
	       I would like to ask Edward to separate out this table
into a separate MIB (possibly in the same document) generalizing the
comments, 
	that would allow the ADSL MIB WG  to make use of these tables,
if this work becomes chartered. 
	
	       I would appreciate your advice on this issue. 
	
	Best Regards, 
	Menachem Dodge_______________________________________________
	Adslmib mailing list
	[email protected]
	https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib

_______________________________________________
Adslmib mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/adslmib