RE: WGLC for: draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-cu-mib-06.txt

Moti,
I agree with your comments. Thanks for catching it.
Regards,
-E. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Moti Morgenstern [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 7:07 PM
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert); Hubmib Mailing List (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: [Hubmib] WGLC for: draft-ietf-hubmib-efm-cu-mib-06.txt
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> 1) A minor issue regarding to 'on top of'
>     - In the ifCapStackTable's description 
>       = It first appears as: ...possible 'on top of'...
>       = then: ...run 'on top of'... (which is same as the first)
>       = but then: ...run on top of... (should be: run 'on top of')
> 2) Again, regarding to 'on top of' but this time more important
>     - In the ifCapStackEntry's description 
>       = It appears as: ...runs on 'top' of
>          which I assume should be changed to: MAY run 'on top of'...
> 3) In the ifCapStackEntry's description, shouldn't the sentence in 
>     parentheses be "(interface index for higher- and lower-layer
> respectively)?
> 4) Explaining the value 'active' for ifCapStatusStack 
>     = The MINIMUM change required is using the term 
> 'underneath' isntead
>        of 'below'.
>     =  It is recommended, however, to perform a deeper change, because
> the
>         ifCapStackTable is actually from the p.o.v. of the 
> HIGHER layer.
> The
>         proposed text would be "indicates that the sub-layer 
> interface,
>         identified by the ifStackHigherLayer MAY be connected to run
>         'on top of' the sub-layer interface, identified by the
> ifStackLowerLayer index."
>  
> Regards,
> Moti M
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Hubmib mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hubmib
>