Re: IDN eamples for testing
"Martin v. Löwis" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.idn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
James Seng schrieb: >>Can you elaborate? How does this break anything? They respond to >>strictly erroneous requests, with erroneous responses. I can't see >>how this could cause failures of other participants of the DNS. > > > Two wrong dont make it right. Nothing in RFC 1034 & 1035 mention the DNS > should response error with error. Certainly correct, and I completely agree that such a server is not following the DNS RFCs. However, I was specially asking how this protocol violation is "breaking the basic functionity of DNS". > According to RFC 2616, the BNF for Host header is as follows: > > Host = "Host" ":" host [ ":" port ] > > And "host" is adopted from RFC 2396, Ah, I see. That was not clear to me, as section 14.23 refers to section 3.2.2 only, which does not refer further (although 3.2.1 does, which I missed). Regards, Martin