Re: rename ToUnicode?

Adam M. Costello wrote:

>Keld Jørn Simonsen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I don't think that ToUnicode is the correct name, as it is really
>> 10646 that it is defined for.
>
>The difference between ISO-10646 and Unicode is not relevant here.
>Both use the same table that maps between code points and characters.
>The difference (as I understand it) is that Unicode defines lots of
>additional information about the characters and how to handle them,
>while ISO-10646 is little more than a table and some encoding forms.


IETF should refer to official standards organisations if possible.

So ToUCS is better than ToUnicode.


   Dan