Re: IDN's with any ASCII character
John C Klensin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.idn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--On Tuesday, 29 April, 2003 23:21 -0700 Doug Ewell <[email protected]> wrote: > There's no such thing as "high ASCII." ASCII only goes up to > 0x7F. Everything else is Latin-1 or Unicode or GB 18030 or > something else, but it can't be called ASCII. Doug, just in the interest of being precise about this, my recollection is that the first US version of "Latin-1" (aka ISO 8859-1) was formally known as "8 bit ASCII". The current version of "ASCII" -- ANSI/INCITS 4-1986 (formerly X3.4) is titled "Information Systems - Coded Character Sets - 7-Bit American National Standard Code for Information Interchange (7-Bit ASCII)" The parenthetical note is an artifact of that "... Coded Character Sets - 8-Bit American National... document which, if I recall, was withdrawn when the US adopted/endorsed ISO 8859-1 rather than maintaining its own version. The ANSI (and INCITS) rules about references to withdrawn standards are a bit muddy, but to characterize such a reference with "can't be called" is excessive. While, as far as I know, "high ASCII" has never been a standard term, "ASCII-8" and "8-Bit ASCII" definitely have been. And both terms are still used informally, both inside and outside the US, to refer to the Standardized form of Latin-1, i.e., ISO 8859-1. john