Re: meeting in Yokohama

Dear John,

Thank you for the suggestion, I see.
I think there are one point to be make clear.
Just shut it down? how about the four drafts?

xiaodong
________________________________________
----- 原始邮件 ----- 
发件人: "John C Klensin" <[email protected]>
收件人: "Xiaodong LEE" <[email protected]>; "James Seng" <[email protected]>; "IETF/IDN WG" <[email protected]>
发送时间: 2002年5月17日 上午 09:28
主题: Re: [idn] meeting in Yokohama


| 
| 
| --On Friday, 17 May, 2002 08:47 +0800 xiaodong lee
| <[email protected]> wrote:
| 
| > I think it is necessary to meet each other, coz there maybe
| > some other things to be decided in face to face meeting for so
| > many  active persons in IDN WG, e.g. next step for IDN.
| > And with that, we should absorb more people to complete the
| > idn-admin which is the great job.
| 
| For whatever it is worth, and with the understanding that I'm
| speaking only for myself, I'd suggest a different model.  We
| should finish the small amount of work that is clearly on IDN's
| agenda and shut it down.  The WG has just dragged on too long
| and accumulated too much baggage and debris.  Then, if you (or
| others) have other agenda items (I know I do), it would be good
| write the ideas down in the form of a proposal for a BOF or a
| draft charter for another WG.  In other words, shutting IDN down
| doesn't terminate all of the work that will now have to be done
| with these names, including examining how they fit into
| applications and how selected applications protocols should be
| extended or modified.  That work is important and should be done
| somewhere.  But there are few, if any, advantages of trying to
| fit it into the IDN WG and we have all observed the
| disadvantages of trying to do so.
| 
| regards,
|     john
| 
|