Re: homogram attacks: cyrillic and registration guideline

Dear Soobook,
it would have been so easy to say 'all the IDNs are to be punycoded 3LD+ 
with "xn--ISO 639 language code" as an SLD, language code+TLD being 
documented by the TLD table'. This would have permitted additional 
limited/full mixed tables in permitting ISO 639+1 or 2 chars tags. This 
would have been so coherent with DNS that this is probably the way plug-ins 
resolve the problem, until some fed-up Govs create their own conpressed 
"xn--ISO 639.ccTLD" version under the form of MLTLDs with their common 
addition to the root.

Anyway all this is of low interest since what we discuss are SLDs, not 3LDs 
and lower where the registrant is free.
jfc

On 11:29 16/02/2005, Soobok Lee said:

>IDN WG had discussed about this IDN-based homogram attacks 3 years ago.
>The conclustion is that:   the problem should be solved in registration stage,
>  not in encoding/protocol level.
>
>So we have now "IDN registration guideline for CJK (han ideographs) 
>languages", but that
>does not cover cyrillic / greek  ones yet.  IETF  seems to have  no 
>plan  to expand  and
>publish it.  that is,  "Do it yourself , registries !",
>
>http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0400.pdf
>
>I ask you all  to open this PDF unicode chart   and see  how many 
>lowercase cyrllic
>alhpabets look exactly the same as  their  latin-alphabet lowercase 
>counterparts .
>
>To list some of them, " a  e  i  y  c o s j".
>(some of them are not russian,but for eastern europe)
>
>In the uppercase characters, "B H M P" including the above 8 chars.
>cyrillicHP.com /ascii HP.com came from the latter category.
>
>please compare the lowercase  "cyrillic iii.com" with  ascii "iii.com"
>. In the address bar,
>they may look exactly the same, because cyrillic/ascii fonts are almost 
>the same ones
>in many OS/GUI  environments.
>
>Soobok
>
>
>