Re: meeting in Yokohama
John C Klensin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.idn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <98327985.1021587193@localhost> |
--On Friday, 17 May, 2002 11:00 +0900 Soobok Lee <[email protected]> wrote: > Dynamic DNS Update (RFC2137) features allow some > similar/identically-looking IDN ACE labels to be inserted > without any intervention from human administrators. > IDN-administration draft efforts, most of which have focus on > the idn REGISTRATION, may be ignoring those > protocol/security/architectural issues. ACE labels are to be > treated and trusted as ASCII ones but it shouldn't . That will > be a great blow to the stability,trustworthiness and security > of global DNS systems. I don't know quite how to say this politely, but, so? More specifically and to review the procedures as I understand them: * If you think this is an argument that the current drafts should not be approved, or even subject to an IETF Last Call, try to convince the ADs. If they ignore you and issue a Last Call anyway, you could presumably appeal their decision, although (speaking as an individual), I wouldn't particularly recommend that. * If you believe when an IETF Last Call opens that there are important issues that the WG had declined, or been unable, to address effectively, you should raise the issues --forcefully and with good and specific documentation-- at that point. If you conclude that there is no adequate response, you have the right to use the appeal mechanism at that stage. * If you believe that there are technical issues that should be addressed in a WG, you should propose an appropriate WG with an appropriate charter. It seems very clear to me that the current IDN group, having not been willing to address these issues in the past (at least partially because many people believe they are not within the charter), is not going to address them in useful ways in the future. But the current WG, I believe, should be around long enough to get the documents that are now in front of the IESG finished, and then should be shut down rather than looking for new tasks or picking up discarded ones. Just my opinion. john