Re: meeting in Yokohama

> I would assume that the current WG isn't going anywhere before
> the IESG has signed off on the drafts it is now processing.  But
> that end-game state is not justification for holding a meeting
> in Yokohama unless the ADs conclude that they need one to deal
> with outstanding issues in the document.  And nothing in the
> various notes Erik has circulated would lead me to predict that,
> although I could, of course, be wrong.

Correct, this AD has no such concerns.
My hope is to see I-D versions that address (or explicitly choose to not
address :-) my suggestions for editorial clarifications real soon so that
we can start the IETF-wide last call.

*If* those last calls result in significant issues then the WG will need
to decide how to handle them. At which point the WG might decide it
needs the high bandwidth communication of a meeting.

But it would be useful to be able to make that decision sooner rather than
later by getting updated I-Ds out.

  Erik