Re: quick & dirty (but not too dirty) homograph defense

At 03:17 21/02/2005, John C Klensin wrote:
>(a) such a change would not change the
>number of strings or characters that can be registered at all:
>only the base characters can actually appear in an IDNA string
>post the ToUnicode(ToASCII(char)) operation pair

Interesting idea, but you may lose every chance to have a RHD/LHD common 
support if you make it too simply. On the countrary it permits to have the 
information to differentiate upper and lower cases if/when needed.
jfc