Re: IDN spoofing
William Tan <[email protected]> Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:51:32 +1100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.idn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Erik van der Poel wrote: > If the lookalike mapping is not set in stone at the protocol level > (i.e. embedded in the app), then the registry will have to activate > *all* the variants, otherwise the app will not be able to look up all > of them. No? For many variants, it's good enough to block them from being registered by phishers. One wouldn't expect the users to type in "coca-co1a.com" (with latin "1" instead of "l"), right? > Alternatively, you could embed each registry's lookalike mapping table > into the app and just activate one of the variants. I feel like I'm > missing something... > That wouldn't be a good idea, for reasons that John explained in an earlier mail about blacklists. wil.