Re: Re: process
Erik van der Poel <[email protected]> Fri, 25 Feb 2005 09:14:34 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.idn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
James Seng wrote: > FYI, punctuation were also debated extensively back then so it isn't > really 'Oh, we just discover this!'. > > It's just interesting to see people putting it into action. Does apps > needs to be fixed? Yes, absolutely. App developers needs to go read the > security consideration of rfc3490 and think about how to implement some > solution to reduce the spoofing risk. > > but does it warrant changing the existing rfc? I dunno..I havent seen > anything that suggest we missed something back then. That's a pretty cavalier attitude for someone who used to be co-chair of an IETF Working Group. http://ietf.org/html.charters/OLD/idn-charter.html Maybe I should write an Informational RFC titled "IDN Considered Harmful". Would that catch your attention? Erik PS Re: RFC 3490 Security Considerations, please tell me exactly where punctuation is specifically mentioned.