Re: IDNA section 3.1 requirement 3
Gervase Markham <[email protected]> Fri, 18 Mar 2005 00:08:56 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.idn |
|---|---|
| Organization | mozilla.org |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
James Seng wrote: > I am also concern about "standardizing" how applications should flag out > IDN or determine dangerous IDNs etc. I dont see why we need > standardization in this area when we never really standardize the "lock > icon" for https or etc. Instead, I think we should let market force work > this out, and lets apps developers innovates on how to display these IDN > properly. I'm afraid I disagree. I was having dinner with some Microsoft security guys only this evening where we agreed that having the lock as a standard image really helped, but now we need to move to a slightly more fine-grained model and it would be extremely useful if everyone used the same notations for the new trust states. Having said that, I believe that if we get to a situation where we need to "flag out IDN", we've failed. Gerv