RE: Using a new class for IDN

> 
> While I find it kind of ironic, though not surprising that the so heralded
> "quick fix" method is not so "quick" afterall, perhaps our effort 
> should now
> (that the IDNA thing is more or less ready) move towards a 
> solution that is
> truly more "satisfactory" as you have mentioned.
> 

You try to identify the potential issue from a broader aspect. Which is out
of the wg concern.

> By the way, just to make it clear, this is not intended to block or stall
> the current IDNA effort, but pointing out the plain fact about a 
> real world

Fact (or potential fact) may not be the key issue. You already mentioned
who can be benefited from the quick fix. It's not difficult to extend the logic.

Kenny