Re: IDNA: is the specification proper, adequate, and complete? (was: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-08.txt)

Dave Crocker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.idn
Message-ID <[email protected]>
At 10:55 AM 6/16/2002 +0800, James Seng wrote:
>I think the discussion of IETF history, experience and best practice should
>be bought to another list (poised?) or offline, despite the education value.
>Given we are in the last stage of the wg, I dont think we have too many
>newcomers lately.

James,

Please review the context of the historical comment.  I was responding to 
an apparent suggestion that this working group delay publishing the current 
work until it completed additional work that had not yet started.  So, the 
reference to history was solely for suggesting guidance in the current IDN 
working group circumstance.

d/


----------
Dave Crocker <mailto:[email protected]>
TribalWise, Inc. <http://www.tribalwise.com>
tel +1.408.246.8253; fax +1.408.850.1850
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.