Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-idn-idna-10.txt

--On 2002-07-04 16.37 +0200 Erik Nordmark <[email protected]> wrote:

> Correct me if I am wrong, ut I didn't think they were going to use IDNA; 
> neither iSCSI names or kerberos realms are domain names (they have
> different syntactic restrictions as far as I knpw) and IDNA is
> about domain names. Thus they might use punycode if they need an
> ASCII encoding, but not IDNA.

They have done their own profiles of stringprep.

See for example draft-ietf-ips-iscsi-string-prep-02.txt.

   paf